Quality improvement in healthcare: Six Sigma systematic review

Six Sigma has been widely used in the healthcare sector as a management tool to improve patient quality and safety. The objective of this study is to identify opportunities for its implementation through literature analysis. A literature review has been carried out since the first publication of Six Sigma in the sector appeared until 2017, 20 years in all. To this end, it has been used three databases: MEDLINE, Web of Science (Core Collection) and Scopus. Accordance with the 196 articles of our database, it is found that: (1) Six Sigma publications in healthcare sector have been carried out mostly in the USA, (2) multiple specialities and services have used this tool, among them, we can emphasize the operating room and radiology service, (3) the case study has been the most used methodology and, (4) the objectives are focused mainly on achieving reductions of time, costs and errors, for the improvement of the quality and the satisfaction of the patients. This review seeks to serve healthcare professionals to know the benefits that Six Sigma can generate in processes that take place in a health center, hospital or other organizations in the sector.

Keywords: Bibliometric; Literature review; Quality improvement; Six Sigma; healthcare.

Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Similar articles

Amaratunga T, Dobranowski J. Amaratunga T, et al. J Am Coll Radiol. 2016 Sep;13(9):1088-1095.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2016.02.033. Epub 2016 May 19. J Am Coll Radiol. 2016. PMID: 27209599 Review.

Suman G, Prajapati DR. Suman G, et al. PLoS One. 2021 Dec 23;16(12):e0261747. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261747. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 34941958 Free PMC article.

Thakur V, Akerele OA, Randell E. Thakur V, et al. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2023 Jan;60(1):63-81. doi: 10.1080/10408363.2022.2106544. Epub 2022 Aug 17. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2023. PMID: 35978530

Zimmermann GDS, Siqueira LD, Bohomol E. Zimmermann GDS, et al. Rev Bras Enferm. 2020 Dec 21;73(suppl 5):e20190861. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2019-0861. eCollection 2020. Rev Bras Enferm. 2020. PMID: 33338158 Review. English, Portuguese.

Ahmed S. Ahmed S. Rev Environ Health. 2019 Dec 18;34(4):427-434. doi: 10.1515/reveh-2019-0003. Rev Environ Health. 2019. PMID: 31314742 Review.

Cited by

Zhu LF, Wang XF, Chen HX, Liu Q, Zhu LH, Ying QS. Zhu LF, et al. Inquiry. 2024 Jan-Dec;61:469580241249425. doi: 10.1177/00469580241249425. Inquiry. 2024. PMID: 38727154 Free PMC article.

Sallam M. Sallam M. Cureus. 2024 Mar 29;16(3):e57176. doi: 10.7759/cureus.57176. eCollection 2024 Mar. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 38681323 Free PMC article. Review.

Hellstrand Tang U, Smith F, Karilampi UL, Gremyr A. Hellstrand Tang U, et al. JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Apr 26;11:e50889. doi: 10.2196/50889. JMIR Hum Factors. 2024. PMID: 38669076 Free PMC article.

Almalki A, Jambi A, Elbehiry B, Albuti H. Almalki A, et al. Glob J Qual Saf Healthc. 2023 Nov 24;6(4):117-125. doi: 10.36401/JQSH-23-15. eCollection 2023 Nov. Glob J Qual Saf Healthc. 2023. PMID: 38404460 Free PMC article.

Kannan N, Ramalingam K, Ramani P. Kannan N, et al. Cureus. 2024 Jan 21;16(1):e52651. doi: 10.7759/cureus.52651. eCollection 2024 Jan. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 38380190 Free PMC article. Review.